https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410774 The authority declined to provide advance rulings on the classification of stainless steel cans, flavored milk, milk cream, and cold coffee due to various reasons such as the applicant's status as a recipient, connection to a dismissed case, and lack of sufficient information. Additionally, it was ruled that the provision of subsidized lunch and refreshments to employees by paying part of the cost does not constitute a supply under the CGST Act 2017. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410774 The authority declined to provide advance rulings on the classification of stainless steel cans, flavored milk, milk cream, and cold coffee due to various reasons such as the applicant's status as a recipient, connection to a dismissed case, and lack of sufficient information. Additionally, it was ruled that the provision of subsidized lunch and refreshments to employees by paying part of the cost does not constitute a supply under the CGST Act 2017. Case-Laws GST Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410774