https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410768 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the Joint Commissioner to inform the petitioner's banker that the provisional attachment order on the bank account was no longer valid. The Court emphasized the need for prompt action and restrained the respondents from initiating further recovery proceedings since the petitioner had made a pre-deposit as required by the law. The Court granted relief to the petitioner, clarifying the legal aspects related to provisional attachment, termination of proceedings, and the stay on recovery proceedings under the CGST Act. en-us Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410768 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the Joint Commissioner to inform the petitioner's banker that the provisional attachment order on the bank account was no longer valid. The Court emphasized the need for prompt action and restrained the respondents from initiating further recovery proceedings since the petitioner had made a pre-deposit as required by the law. The Court granted relief to the petitioner, clarifying the legal aspects related to provisional attachment, termination of proceedings, and the stay on recovery proceedings under the CGST Act. Case-Laws GST Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410768