<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 339 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the refund claim was barred by limitation as it was filed seven years after surrendering registration, despite the appellants&#039; arguments of pending proceedings. The Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed unjustified in rejecting the refund claim on merits when the Assistant Commissioner had not done so. Member (Judicial) disagreed with the majority, suggesting a remand to consider both limitation and merits. However, the majority decision supported the rejection of the refund claim on both grounds, in line with prior legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 339 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the refund claim was barred by limitation as it was filed seven years after surrendering registration, despite the appellants&#039; arguments of pending proceedings. The Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed unjustified in rejecting the refund claim on merits when the Assistant Commissioner had not done so. Member (Judicial) disagreed with the majority, suggesting a remand to consider both limitation and merits. However, the majority decision supported the rejection of the refund claim on both grounds, in line with prior legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>