<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 324 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for all the assessment years, ruling that the additions made by the AO were without jurisdiction and unsupported by incriminating evidence. The Tribunal directed the deletion of all additions made under sections 68 and 69C and upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 10(38) for long-term capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:53:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 324 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for all the assessment years, ruling that the additions made by the AO were without jurisdiction and unsupported by incriminating evidence. The Tribunal directed the deletion of all additions made under sections 68 and 69C and upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 10(38) for long-term capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>