<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26206</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled against allowing exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act for individual partners based on mere book entries. The court emphasized the necessity of registered instruments for property transfers within a firm, setting a legal precedent for future cases. The court&#039;s decision favored the Revenue, rejecting the validity of property transfer solely through book entries and highlighting the importance of complying with legal requirements for property ownership and transfer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26206</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled against allowing exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act for individual partners based on mere book entries. The court emphasized the necessity of registered instruments for property transfers within a firm, setting a legal precedent for future cases. The court&#039;s decision favored the Revenue, rejecting the validity of property transfer solely through book entries and highlighting the importance of complying with legal requirements for property ownership and transfer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>