<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1735 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the matter to be sent back to the AO to quantify and allow the deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act if the assessee had purchased an eligible residential house property within the prescribed time. The disallowance of the loss claimed from a house property was upheld by the ld. CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1735 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the matter to be sent back to the AO to quantify and allow the deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act if the assessee had purchased an eligible residential house property within the prescribed time. The disallowance of the loss claimed from a house property was upheld by the ld. CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>