<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296818</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) disallowing a payment made by the firm to the deceased partner&#039;s spouse, despite the appellant&#039;s arguments based on the partnership deed. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s decision well-reasoned and noted a previous ruling against the appellant on a similar issue. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance of the payment as a revenue expenditure under section 37.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296818</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) disallowing a payment made by the firm to the deceased partner&#039;s spouse, despite the appellant&#039;s arguments based on the partnership deed. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s decision well-reasoned and noted a previous ruling against the appellant on a similar issue. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance of the payment as a revenue expenditure under section 37.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>