https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296831 Rejection of a landline connection request on the bare ground of non-feasibility was unsustainable because the original order could not be improved by additional reasons first set out in the counter affidavit, and the explanation for infeasibility was found vague. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration with directions to take effective steps to make the area feasible and facilitate connection, subject to the applicant sharing part of any transit expenses incurred exclusively for the installation. Section 7B arbitration under the Indian Telegraph Act was also held unavailable at this stage, as no subscriber relationship or contractual dispute had yet arisen. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:52:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296831 Rejection of a landline connection request on the bare ground of non-feasibility was unsustainable because the original order could not be improved by additional reasons first set out in the counter affidavit, and the explanation for infeasibility was found vague. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration with directions to take effective steps to make the area feasible and facilitate connection, subject to the applicant sharing part of any transit expenses incurred exclusively for the installation. Section 7B arbitration under the Indian Telegraph Act was also held unavailable at this stage, as no subscriber relationship or contractual dispute had yet arisen. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296831