https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296816 The court dismissed the petition challenging detention, emphasizing that rejection of bail applications does not automatically invalidate detention if warranted by circumstances. It clarified that withholding material could only vitiate detention if it would impact the decision. The court found the petitioner's claims of non-supply of documents and illegible documents insufficient to prove prejudice, upholding the detention. The decision highlighted the detaining authority's discretion in detention decisions based on relevant considerations, separate from bail applications, and set standards for material withholding to invalidate detention. en-us Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Aug 2021 17:19:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296816 The court dismissed the petition challenging detention, emphasizing that rejection of bail applications does not automatically invalidate detention if warranted by circumstances. It clarified that withholding material could only vitiate detention if it would impact the decision. The court found the petitioner's claims of non-supply of documents and illegible documents insufficient to prove prejudice, upholding the detention. The decision highlighted the detaining authority's discretion in detention decisions based on relevant considerations, separate from bail applications, and set standards for material withholding to invalidate detention. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296816