<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 854 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296815</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Criminal Revision Application, quashed the previous judgments, permitted compounding of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and acquitted the accused. The fine paid by the accused was treated as costs towards the Government and not refunded to the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 17:04:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 854 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296815</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Criminal Revision Application, quashed the previous judgments, permitted compounding of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and acquitted the accused. The fine paid by the accused was treated as costs towards the Government and not refunded to the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>