https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296814 A later petition under Article 226 read with Section 482 CrPC was held maintainable despite dismissal of an earlier revision, because special circumstances arising from a genuine compromise and partial payment justified intervention to prevent failure of justice. The Court also treated cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as compoundable on the basis of an out-of-court settlement, holding that Section 147 operates as a special overriding provision and that prior court permission is not a condition precedent. On that basis, the compromise was accepted, the conviction and sentence were quashed, and the accused was treated as acquitted on compounding. en-us Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296814 A later petition under Article 226 read with Section 482 CrPC was held maintainable despite dismissal of an earlier revision, because special circumstances arising from a genuine compromise and partial payment justified intervention to prevent failure of justice. The Court also treated cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as compoundable on the basis of an out-of-court settlement, holding that Section 147 operates as a special overriding provision and that prior court permission is not a condition precedent. On that basis, the compromise was accepted, the conviction and sentence were quashed, and the accused was treated as acquitted on compounding. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296814