<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 652 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296814</link>
    <description>The High Court, after considering the legality and validity of the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, accepted the compromise between the parties and quashed the conviction and sentence. The Court emphasized the applicability of Section 147 of the N.I. Act, allowing for compounding of the offence at any stage, including post-revision. Consequently, the accused was acquitted, and costs were imposed on both petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 652 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296814</link>
      <description>The High Court, after considering the legality and validity of the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, accepted the compromise between the parties and quashed the conviction and sentence. The Court emphasized the applicability of Section 147 of the N.I. Act, allowing for compounding of the offence at any stage, including post-revision. Consequently, the accused was acquitted, and costs were imposed on both petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>