https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296812 Preventive detention remains open to judicial review under Article 226 even after confirmation by the Advisory Board and the Government, because such confirmation does not create a merger with the original order. Documents forming the basis of subjective satisfaction must be supplied to the detenu to enable an effective representation under Article 22(5); failure to furnish relied upon material vitiates detention, even if the detenu may already know its contents. Delay in passing the order is not automatically fatal where the detention record shows continuing scrutiny and the nexus with prejudicial activity remains live. Custody does not by itself invalidate detention if the authority knows of it and expects imminent release. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Aug 2021 16:27:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296812 Preventive detention remains open to judicial review under Article 226 even after confirmation by the Advisory Board and the Government, because such confirmation does not create a merger with the original order. Documents forming the basis of subjective satisfaction must be supplied to the detenu to enable an effective representation under Article 22(5); failure to furnish relied upon material vitiates detention, even if the detenu may already know its contents. Delay in passing the order is not automatically fatal where the detention record shows continuing scrutiny and the nexus with prejudicial activity remains live. Custody does not by itself invalidate detention if the authority knows of it and expects imminent release. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296812