<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1717 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296808</link>
    <description>Share-capital consolidation was treated as permissible where authorised by the articles of association and the Companies Act, 1956, and approved through a special resolution. The High Court upheld the consolidation and the amended article governing it, finding that the statutory power to consolidate shares into larger denominations also supported arrangements for fractional entitlements. Allegations that the measure was designed to force out minority shareholders failed for lack of supporting material; majority approval and a just and equitable exit offer weighed against oppression. The appeal was dismissed, and the consolidation, amended article, and procedure for acquiring fractional shares remained valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 14:33:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1717 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296808</link>
      <description>Share-capital consolidation was treated as permissible where authorised by the articles of association and the Companies Act, 1956, and approved through a special resolution. The High Court upheld the consolidation and the amended article governing it, finding that the statutory power to consolidate shares into larger denominations also supported arrangements for fractional entitlements. Allegations that the measure was designed to force out minority shareholders failed for lack of supporting material; majority approval and a just and equitable exit offer weighed against oppression. The appeal was dismissed, and the consolidation, amended article, and procedure for acquiring fractional shares remained valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>