<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 316 - AUTHORTTY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS CUSTOMS, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410738</link>
    <description>The application was deemed defective and rejected. The applicant was advised to file fresh applications for advance rulings for each product in accordance with the law. The ruling highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory mandates and the practical implications of seeking advance rulings for multiple products or ports in a single application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 316 - AUTHORTTY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS CUSTOMS, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410738</link>
      <description>The application was deemed defective and rejected. The applicant was advised to file fresh applications for advance rulings for each product in accordance with the law. The ruling highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory mandates and the practical implications of seeking advance rulings for multiple products or ports in a single application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>