<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 309 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410731</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned assessment order due to the petitioner not being afforded a personal hearing as mandated by the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act. The matter was remanded to the respondent for reevaluation, with instructions to provide a reasonable opportunity for explanation, including a personal hearing within three months. The petitioner was directed to produce relevant records during the hearing, no costs were awarded, and the Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 08:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 309 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410731</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned assessment order due to the petitioner not being afforded a personal hearing as mandated by the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act. The matter was remanded to the respondent for reevaluation, with instructions to provide a reasonable opportunity for explanation, including a personal hearing within three months. The petitioner was directed to produce relevant records during the hearing, no costs were awarded, and the Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>