<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 302 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order, stating that interest on the delayed refund was rightly sanctioned from the date the application was considered complete on 14.07.2018. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed based on compliance with section 11B of the Central Excise Act and previous Mumbai Tribunal precedent. The decision was pronounced on 06-08-2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 13:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 302 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order, stating that interest on the delayed refund was rightly sanctioned from the date the application was considered complete on 14.07.2018. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed based on compliance with section 11B of the Central Excise Act and previous Mumbai Tribunal precedent. The decision was pronounced on 06-08-2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>