<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 299 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the challenged order, emphasizing violations of statutory principles and lack of proper evidence appreciation. The appeal was allowed, stressing adherence to natural justice principles and evidentiary standards, highlighting the significance of cross-examination and compliance with Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 08:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 299 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the challenged order, emphasizing violations of statutory principles and lack of proper evidence appreciation. The appeal was allowed, stressing adherence to natural justice principles and evidentiary standards, highlighting the significance of cross-examination and compliance with Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>