<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 286 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410708</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on all issues, including the claim for depreciation on goodwill, the use of the purchase method for accounting the amalgamation, the DCF method for valuing goodwill, and the applicability of Section 56(2)(viib). The ITAT also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the benefit of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 08:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 286 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410708</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on all issues, including the claim for depreciation on goodwill, the use of the purchase method for accounting the amalgamation, the DCF method for valuing goodwill, and the applicability of Section 56(2)(viib). The ITAT also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the benefit of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>