https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296800 The court dismissed the petition, affirming the arbitral award, stating that the stringent tests of Section 34(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, were not met. The court emphasized the limited scope of interference under Section 34, noting the Arbitrator's thorough consideration of the evidence. en-us Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Aug 2021 08:49:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296800 The court dismissed the petition, affirming the arbitral award, stating that the stringent tests of Section 34(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, were not met. The court emphasized the limited scope of interference under Section 34, noting the Arbitrator's thorough consideration of the evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296800