https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296799 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the appellate order under the UP VAT Act for the Assessment Year 2015-2016. The court held that the petitioner should have pursued the statutory remedy of a second appeal instead of directly approaching the High Court. It advised the petitioner to seek refunds through proper channels and emphasized that each proceeding should be assessed independently. The court rejected the argument that a writ petition would halt multiple proceedings and stressed the importance of following the statutory framework for legal matters. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 14:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296799 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the appellate order under the UP VAT Act for the Assessment Year 2015-2016. The court held that the petitioner should have pursued the statutory remedy of a second appeal instead of directly approaching the High Court. It advised the petitioner to seek refunds through proper channels and emphasized that each proceeding should be assessed independently. The court rejected the argument that a writ petition would halt multiple proceedings and stressed the importance of following the statutory framework for legal matters. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 06 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296799