https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296793 The Court dismissed the appeal in a case involving the recovery of deposited sums of money, applying the Limitation Act. The appellant's suit seeking recovery of funds deposited in bank accounts was found time-barred under Article 19, as the deposits were made in May 2010, and the suit was filed in August 2014. Despite unchallenged evidence of deposits, the lack of proof regarding the money being payable on demand led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Court emphasized the distinction between Articles 19 and 22 of the Act, ultimately upholding the Trial Court's decision and imposing costs on the appellant. en-us Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:20:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296793 The Court dismissed the appeal in a case involving the recovery of deposited sums of money, applying the Limitation Act. The appellant's suit seeking recovery of funds deposited in bank accounts was found time-barred under Article 19, as the deposits were made in May 2010, and the suit was filed in August 2014. Despite unchallenged evidence of deposits, the lack of proof regarding the money being payable on demand led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Court emphasized the distinction between Articles 19 and 22 of the Act, ultimately upholding the Trial Court's decision and imposing costs on the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296793