https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296784 The High Court allowed the petition challenging the rejection of refund applications for countervailing duty paid by a company for imported goods. Despite the delay in filing, the court held that the duty was paid under a mistake, entitling the company to the refund claimed. Emphasizing the importance of diligently pursuing remedies and the duty of a welfare state to refund amounts not lawfully due, the court directed the authorities to refund the duty promptly, with interest if there is a delay, granting relief to the petitioner-company. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Aug 2021 16:15:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296784 The High Court allowed the petition challenging the rejection of refund applications for countervailing duty paid by a company for imported goods. Despite the delay in filing, the court held that the duty was paid under a mistake, entitling the company to the refund claimed. Emphasizing the importance of diligently pursuing remedies and the duty of a welfare state to refund amounts not lawfully due, the court directed the authorities to refund the duty promptly, with interest if there is a delay, granting relief to the petitioner-company. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 21 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296784