<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1308 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296783</link>
    <description>Limitation was extended by part payment under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, making the suit timely. Privity and contractual liability were found with the second defendant because the invoices were addressed to it, it made part payment and issued a TDS certificate, and the plaintiff dealt with it directly. The plaintiff was entitled to commercial rates, as the defendants did not notify any restriction to DAVP rates before publication and had accepted the benefit of the advertisements; the claim for damages failed for lack of proof. Simple interest at 6% per annum was awarded on the balance principal for the relevant periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 10:50:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1308 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296783</link>
      <description>Limitation was extended by part payment under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, making the suit timely. Privity and contractual liability were found with the second defendant because the invoices were addressed to it, it made part payment and issued a TDS certificate, and the plaintiff dealt with it directly. The plaintiff was entitled to commercial rates, as the defendants did not notify any restriction to DAVP rates before publication and had accepted the benefit of the advertisements; the claim for damages failed for lack of proof. Simple interest at 6% per annum was awarded on the balance principal for the relevant periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>