https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296780 The Tribunal overturned the order imposing a 6-year ban on market access and trading activities for alleged market manipulation. The appellant's trading behavior was deemed suspicious, but the lack of collusion between the appellant and any buyer led to the charges being unsubstantiated. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proving collusion to establish market manipulation and highlighted the importance of concrete evidence in cases of fraudulent trading practices. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the significance of establishing collusion in such cases. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:18:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296780 The Tribunal overturned the order imposing a 6-year ban on market access and trading activities for alleged market manipulation. The appellant's trading behavior was deemed suspicious, but the lack of collusion between the appellant and any buyer led to the charges being unsubstantiated. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proving collusion to establish market manipulation and highlighted the importance of concrete evidence in cases of fraudulent trading practices. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the significance of establishing collusion in such cases. Case-Laws SEBI Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296780