<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 264 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410686</link>
    <description>The court granted bail to the petitioner based on merit and medical grounds, subject to various conditions, including furnishing a personal bond, not leaving the country without court permission, cooperating with investigations, and not influencing witnesses. The court clarified that the decision to grant bail did not reflect an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 264 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410686</link>
      <description>The court granted bail to the petitioner based on merit and medical grounds, subject to various conditions, including furnishing a personal bond, not leaving the country without court permission, cooperating with investigations, and not influencing witnesses. The court clarified that the decision to grant bail did not reflect an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>