<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 263 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410685</link>
    <description>Custodial duration, filing of the complaint, lack of further investigative , compoundable nature of the alleged CGST offence, and parity with similarly placed accused supported bail under Section 439 CrPC. The Rajasthan HC noted that the maximum punishment was five years and that no opinion was being expressed on the merits of the case. On those considerations, bail was granted to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 263 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410685</link>
      <description>Custodial duration, filing of the complaint, lack of further investigative , compoundable nature of the alleged CGST offence, and parity with similarly placed accused supported bail under Section 439 CrPC. The Rajasthan HC noted that the maximum punishment was five years and that no opinion was being expressed on the merits of the case. On those considerations, bail was granted to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>