https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410685 The Court granted bail to the petitioners in a case involving jurisdictional conflict between DGGI and CGST in investigating alleged wrongful availing of Input Tax Credit under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Despite serious allegations of involvement in a larger racket issuing fake invoices, the Court considered the petitioners' custody period, lack of necessity for further investigation, and the compoundable nature of the offence with a maximum punishment of five years. Bail was granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. with specified conditions. en-us Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410685 The Court granted bail to the petitioners in a case involving jurisdictional conflict between DGGI and CGST in investigating alleged wrongful availing of Input Tax Credit under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Despite serious allegations of involvement in a larger racket issuing fake invoices, the Court considered the petitioners' custody period, lack of necessity for further investigation, and the compoundable nature of the offence with a maximum punishment of five years. Bail was granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. with specified conditions. Case-Laws GST Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410685