<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 248 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410670</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order on export obligations fulfillment, emphasizing the need to adhere to agreed obligations and address grievances through competent authorities. The petitioner, a rice miller, failed to meet export obligations due to a ban from 2007 to 2011, leading to revenue loss. The respondents argued against relief, citing non-compliance and revenue loss. The court noted the ban lifted in 2011 and upheld the 2nd respondent&#039;s right to invoke the bank guarantee. The petitioner was directed to resolve issues with authorities, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:15:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 248 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410670</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order on export obligations fulfillment, emphasizing the need to adhere to agreed obligations and address grievances through competent authorities. The petitioner, a rice miller, failed to meet export obligations due to a ban from 2007 to 2011, leading to revenue loss. The respondents argued against relief, citing non-compliance and revenue loss. The court noted the ban lifted in 2011 and upheld the 2nd respondent&#039;s right to invoke the bank guarantee. The petitioner was directed to resolve issues with authorities, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>