<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 230 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410652</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed, and the rejection of the refund claims was upheld. The judgment concluded that License Fee (LF) and Spectrum Usage Charges (SUC) are considered a &#039;Supply&#039; under GST law, not regulatory fees, constitute &#039;consideration&#039; for supply, are covered under the Service Rate Notification, and the impugned order, although non-speaking, did not warrant a refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:14:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 230 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410652</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed, and the rejection of the refund claims was upheld. The judgment concluded that License Fee (LF) and Spectrum Usage Charges (SUC) are considered a &#039;Supply&#039; under GST law, not regulatory fees, constitute &#039;consideration&#039; for supply, are covered under the Service Rate Notification, and the impugned order, although non-speaking, did not warrant a refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>