<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 28 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26183</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, directing the Tribunal to reassess whether the assessee had proven the absence of fraud or gross neglect in reporting income. If unsatisfied, the Tribunal should apply penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee was instructed to pay the costs of the reference to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:14:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 28 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26183</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, directing the Tribunal to reassess whether the assessee had proven the absence of fraud or gross neglect in reporting income. If unsatisfied, the Tribunal should apply penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee was instructed to pay the costs of the reference to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>