<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 214 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to verify the availability of own funds for disallowance under Section 14A and to restrict the disallowance to the extent of exempt income earned. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance of the commission paid to the Managing Director under Section 36(1)(ii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 214 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to verify the availability of own funds for disallowance under Section 14A and to restrict the disallowance to the extent of exempt income earned. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance of the commission paid to the Managing Director under Section 36(1)(ii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>