<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 205 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of Shri Navin C. Punjani, limiting the addition to his 1/3rd share in the property. The appeal of Ms. Nisha Navin Punjani was allowed, and the reassessment was quashed due to the invalidity of the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 205 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of Shri Navin C. Punjani, limiting the addition to his 1/3rd share in the property. The appeal of Ms. Nisha Navin Punjani was allowed, and the reassessment was quashed due to the invalidity of the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>