https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410621 The court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate the authenticity of an email granting an adjournment, as disputed by the respondent. Allegations of forgery and fabrication of evidence were made, with potential penal offenses highlighted. The court emphasized the need for a thorough inquiry due to the involvement of sensitive servers and a senior official. The respondent's belated offer to ascertain the email's source was criticized. No coercive action against the petitioner was permitted pending further orders, with the next hearing scheduled for September 6, 2021. en-us Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 20:47:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410621 The court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate the authenticity of an email granting an adjournment, as disputed by the respondent. Allegations of forgery and fabrication of evidence were made, with potential penal offenses highlighted. The court emphasized the need for a thorough inquiry due to the involvement of sensitive servers and a senior official. The respondent's belated offer to ascertain the email's source was criticized. No coercive action against the petitioner was permitted pending further orders, with the next hearing scheduled for September 6, 2021. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410621