https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296760 The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals filed by the Revenue for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11, as there was no incriminating material supporting the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal upheld the orders of the ld. CIT (Appeals) for all years, confirming the deletion of additions due to the lack of such material. The judgment highlighted the requirement of incriminating evidence for revisiting completed assessments, following the precedent set in the CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla case. en-us Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 20:47:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296760 The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals filed by the Revenue for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11, as there was no incriminating material supporting the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal upheld the orders of the ld. CIT (Appeals) for all years, confirming the deletion of additions due to the lack of such material. The judgment highlighted the requirement of incriminating evidence for revisiting completed assessments, following the precedent set in the CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla case. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296760