<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 2 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26179</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the determination of whether securities were held as stock-in-trade or by way of investment was a factual finding. The court emphasized that this distinction is a question of fact rather than law, dismissing the Additional Commissioner&#039;s application for reference on holding securities as stock-in-trade.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:07:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 2 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26179</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the determination of whether securities were held as stock-in-trade or by way of investment was a factual finding. The court emphasized that this distinction is a question of fact rather than law, dismissing the Additional Commissioner&#039;s application for reference on holding securities as stock-in-trade.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>