<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1554 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296770</link>
    <description>A demand raised under the retrospective amendment to the Tamil Nadu VAT law could not be sustained because it arose solely from the amended provision, and a subsequent government notification dated 21.04.2015 waived retrospective demands. The court treated the notification as removing the basis for the demand and, on that footing, held the demand unsustainable. The writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 20:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1554 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296770</link>
      <description>A demand raised under the retrospective amendment to the Tamil Nadu VAT law could not be sustained because it arose solely from the amended provision, and a subsequent government notification dated 21.04.2015 waived retrospective demands. The court treated the notification as removing the basis for the demand and, on that footing, held the demand unsustainable. The writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>