<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1848 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS — MUMBAI BENCH (INCOME-TAX)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296776</link>
    <description>Interest on non-convertible debentures was treated as income from an investment in debt instruments, not as interest on a loan granted by a bank or similar financial institution. The AAR applied the ordinary meaning of &quot;loan&quot; and &quot;grant&quot; and found that the transaction was not a bilateral lending arrangement within article 11(2)(a) of the India-Singapore tax treaty. As a result, the concessional rate under article 11(2)(a) was unavailable, but the applicant could claim the more beneficial treaty rate under article 11(2)(b). The interest was therefore taxable at 15% under article 11(2)(b), with tax deduction at source required at that rate under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 20:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1848 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS — MUMBAI BENCH (INCOME-TAX)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296776</link>
      <description>Interest on non-convertible debentures was treated as income from an investment in debt instruments, not as interest on a loan granted by a bank or similar financial institution. The AAR applied the ordinary meaning of &quot;loan&quot; and &quot;grant&quot; and found that the transaction was not a bilateral lending arrangement within article 11(2)(a) of the India-Singapore tax treaty. As a result, the concessional rate under article 11(2)(a) was unavailable, but the applicant could claim the more beneficial treaty rate under article 11(2)(b). The interest was therefore taxable at 15% under article 11(2)(b), with tax deduction at source required at that rate under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>