<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 289 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296752</link>
    <description>The revision was allowed, setting aside the trial Court&#039;s order. The case was remanded for reconsideration of the application under Order I, Rule 10, and Order XXII, Rule 10, CPC. The plaintiff was granted the chance to challenge the validity of the transfer, potentially affecting the need to add the purchasers as parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 289 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296752</link>
      <description>The revision was allowed, setting aside the trial Court&#039;s order. The case was remanded for reconsideration of the application under Order I, Rule 10, and Order XXII, Rule 10, CPC. The plaintiff was granted the chance to challenge the validity of the transfer, potentially affecting the need to add the purchasers as parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>