https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296752 Pendente lite purchasers in a partition suit may seek impleadment under Order I Rule 10 or leave under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC, because a transferee during litigation remains subject to the decree under the doctrine of lis pendens in section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. Their presence may be necessary for complete adjudication and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, especially where a preliminary decree in partition may affect their direct interest. Discretion under both provisions must be exercised judicially, with regard to the stage of the suit and the nature of the interest claimed. The fact that the matter was posted for judgment, by itself, did not justify rejection of impleadment in the circumstances discussed. en-us Tue, 03 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:59:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296752 Pendente lite purchasers in a partition suit may seek impleadment under Order I Rule 10 or leave under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC, because a transferee during litigation remains subject to the decree under the doctrine of lis pendens in section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. Their presence may be necessary for complete adjudication and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, especially where a preliminary decree in partition may affect their direct interest. Discretion under both provisions must be exercised judicially, with regard to the stage of the suit and the nature of the interest claimed. The fact that the matter was posted for judgment, by itself, did not justify rejection of impleadment in the circumstances discussed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296752