https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296751 Availability of an efficacious remedy under the Code of Civil Procedure restrained writ interference with the plaint and suit proceedings, so the request to quash the civil suit was rejected. However, where the real controversy concerned the lawful managerial rights of a person kept out of the suit, that person was a necessary party and the refusal to implead him, together with an interim injunction passed without hearing him, was vulnerable. The impugned interlocutory orders were therefore set aside, impleadment was allowed, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after hearing the affected party. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:30:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296751 Availability of an efficacious remedy under the Code of Civil Procedure restrained writ interference with the plaint and suit proceedings, so the request to quash the civil suit was rejected. However, where the real controversy concerned the lawful managerial rights of a person kept out of the suit, that person was a necessary party and the refusal to implead him, together with an interim injunction passed without hearing him, was vulnerable. The impugned interlocutory orders were therefore set aside, impleadment was allowed, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after hearing the affected party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296751