<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 435 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296749</link>
    <description>The Division Bench dismissed the writ petition challenging the promotion of respondent 5 over the petitioner to the post of Lower Division Clerk (L.D.C.). The court emphasized the principles of res judicata and procedural rules governing writ petitions, highlighting the binding nature of decisions pronounced on merits unless modified or reversed through appropriate proceedings. The judgment underscores the importance of consistency and finality in judicial decisions, ultimately affirming the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 435 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296749</link>
      <description>The Division Bench dismissed the writ petition challenging the promotion of respondent 5 over the petitioner to the post of Lower Division Clerk (L.D.C.). The court emphasized the principles of res judicata and procedural rules governing writ petitions, highlighting the binding nature of decisions pronounced on merits unless modified or reversed through appropriate proceedings. The judgment underscores the importance of consistency and finality in judicial decisions, ultimately affirming the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>