https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296746 A co-plaintiff who asserts an adverse claim to the subject-matter of the suit cannot properly continue in that role where no joint, several or alternative right to relief is pleaded in his favour. The Court held that Order 1 Rule 10(2) permits a wider adjustment of party status so that all persons necessary for complete adjudication are before the Court, and that Order 23 Rule 1 does not bar correction of the party's position. The proper course was to strike him off as plaintiff and implead him as a defendant. en-us Tue, 02 May 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 15:59:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296746 A co-plaintiff who asserts an adverse claim to the subject-matter of the suit cannot properly continue in that role where no joint, several or alternative right to relief is pleaded in his favour. The Court held that Order 1 Rule 10(2) permits a wider adjustment of party status so that all persons necessary for complete adjudication are before the Court, and that Order 23 Rule 1 does not bar correction of the party's position. The proper course was to strike him off as plaintiff and implead him as a defendant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 May 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296746