https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296744 The court allowed the restoration of the suit for partition and transposed the 6th defendant as a plaintiff based on O. XXIII R. 1-A of the CPC. It was held that abandonment can occur through actions like stating "not pressed," making transposition permissible even after suit disposal. The court emphasized that technicalities should not impede suit restoration, and parties with rival interests can be transposed to ensure fair proceedings. The suit was restored, permitting necessary amendments and granting the original plaintiffs, now defendants, the opportunity to contest the suit. en-us Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 15:19:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296744 The court allowed the restoration of the suit for partition and transposed the 6th defendant as a plaintiff based on O. XXIII R. 1-A of the CPC. It was held that abandonment can occur through actions like stating "not pressed," making transposition permissible even after suit disposal. The court emphasized that technicalities should not impede suit restoration, and parties with rival interests can be transposed to ensure fair proceedings. The suit was restored, permitting necessary amendments and granting the original plaintiffs, now defendants, the opportunity to contest the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296744