https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410602 The writ petition sought to quash a circular and challenge a modified order under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The judgment clarified the application of Sections 30(3)(a) and 30(3)(b), referencing a Delhi High Court case on trademark rights. It emphasized the principle of International Exhaustion of Rights, limiting the original owner's control post-sale. The court disposed of the petition without costs, noting the relevance of the Delhi HC judgment until a Supreme Court ruling. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410602 The writ petition sought to quash a circular and challenge a modified order under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The judgment clarified the application of Sections 30(3)(a) and 30(3)(b), referencing a Delhi High Court case on trademark rights. It emphasized the principle of International Exhaustion of Rights, limiting the original owner's control post-sale. The court disposed of the petition without costs, noting the relevance of the Delhi HC judgment until a Supreme Court ruling. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410602