<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 180 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410602</link>
    <description>International exhaustion of trade mark rights was treated as applicable to lawfully acquired imported goods under Sections 30(3)(a) and 30(3)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The text states that further sale of such goods is not infringement merely because the mark has been assigned to another person or because the goods were first placed on the market and later resold. It further notes that the proprietor&#039;s control over further distribution is exhausted, while any consumer concern arising from after-sales service may be met through appropriate disclosures. The same approach was directed to be followed in the petitioner&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 180 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410602</link>
      <description>International exhaustion of trade mark rights was treated as applicable to lawfully acquired imported goods under Sections 30(3)(a) and 30(3)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The text states that further sale of such goods is not infringement merely because the mark has been assigned to another person or because the goods were first placed on the market and later resold. It further notes that the proprietor&#039;s control over further distribution is exhausted, while any consumer concern arising from after-sales service may be met through appropriate disclosures. The same approach was directed to be followed in the petitioner&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>