<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 178 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410600</link>
    <description>The writ petitions were allowed, setting aside the Order-in-original dated 27.02.2017. Authorities were given liberty to commence fresh proceedings in accordance with the law. The request to keep the order in abeyance was denied, citing the binding precedent of the Apex Court in M/s. Canon India Private Limited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 178 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410600</link>
      <description>The writ petitions were allowed, setting aside the Order-in-original dated 27.02.2017. Authorities were given liberty to commence fresh proceedings in accordance with the law. The request to keep the order in abeyance was denied, citing the binding precedent of the Apex Court in M/s. Canon India Private Limited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>