<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 163 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410585</link>
    <description>The appeal was declined as the Adjudicating Authority chose not to pass a liquidation order at that stage, considering the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors. The Authority stressed the importance of resolution efforts and discretion exercised in the context of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code objectives, emphasizing the need to conclude the process efficiently and effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:44:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 163 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410585</link>
      <description>The appeal was declined as the Adjudicating Authority chose not to pass a liquidation order at that stage, considering the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors. The Authority stressed the importance of resolution efforts and discretion exercised in the context of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code objectives, emphasizing the need to conclude the process efficiently and effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>