<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 159 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of expenses related to the residential premises. The Tribunal emphasized the rule of consistency, the concept of block assets, and the sufficiency of documentary evidence provided by the assessee to substantiate her claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:44:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 159 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of expenses related to the residential premises. The Tribunal emphasized the rule of consistency, the concept of block assets, and the sufficiency of documentary evidence provided by the assessee to substantiate her claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>