https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410577 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of the Appellant Company's name in the register under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite the Appellant's efforts to prove active status with submitted documents, including financial statements, the RoC's strike-off decision was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for companies to demonstrate ongoing business operations or valid reasons for restoration, which the Appellant failed to establish. Compliance with statutory requirements and providing adequate evidence of business activities are crucial for successful restoration under the Companies Act, 2013. en-us Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:44:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410577 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of the Appellant Company's name in the register under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite the Appellant's efforts to prove active status with submitted documents, including financial statements, the RoC's strike-off decision was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for companies to demonstrate ongoing business operations or valid reasons for restoration, which the Appellant failed to establish. Compliance with statutory requirements and providing adequate evidence of business activities are crucial for successful restoration under the Companies Act, 2013. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410577