<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 3 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26166</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1966-67. The Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of penalties was deemed erroneous as evidence indicated income concealment and provision of inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decisions contradicted factual findings, supporting the Revenue&#039;s position that penalties were warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:42:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 3 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26166</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1966-67. The Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of penalties was deemed erroneous as evidence indicated income concealment and provision of inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decisions contradicted factual findings, supporting the Revenue&#039;s position that penalties were warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>