<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1239 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296729</link>
    <description>A Lok Adalat award is binding only when a valid reference exists, a genuine compromise is entered into by duly authorised parties, and the statutory procedure for recording and signing the award is strictly followed. Under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, the Regulations, and the society&#039;s bye-laws, a secretary has no inherent power to compromise litigation without specific authorisation. On the facts noted, no resolution or other proof of lawful authority was produced, the alleged power of attorney was not established from the record, and the award was not properly signed in accordance with the governing requirements. The award was therefore treated as legally invalid and liable to be set aside under writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1239 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296729</link>
      <description>A Lok Adalat award is binding only when a valid reference exists, a genuine compromise is entered into by duly authorised parties, and the statutory procedure for recording and signing the award is strictly followed. Under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, the Regulations, and the society&#039;s bye-laws, a secretary has no inherent power to compromise litigation without specific authorisation. On the facts noted, no resolution or other proof of lawful authority was produced, the alleged power of attorney was not established from the record, and the award was not properly signed in accordance with the governing requirements. The award was therefore treated as legally invalid and liable to be set aside under writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>