https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296716 The Trade Marks Act, 1999 supports international exhaustion for genuine goods lawfully acquired abroad, because section 30 limits the effect of registration and section 30(3) is not confined to a domestic market. As a result, parallel imports of genuine goods are not per se excluded from protection under section 30(3). Further dealings may still be opposed under section 30(4) only where legitimate reasons are proved, such as change or impairment of the goods; differences in features, warranties, after-sales arrangements or pricing were insufficient on the facts. Meta-tagging of a competitor's website was treated as unjustified and capable of supporting injunctive relief. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Aug 2021 16:13:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296716 The Trade Marks Act, 1999 supports international exhaustion for genuine goods lawfully acquired abroad, because section 30 limits the effect of registration and section 30(3) is not confined to a domestic market. As a result, parallel imports of genuine goods are not per se excluded from protection under section 30(3). Further dealings may still be opposed under section 30(4) only where legitimate reasons are proved, such as change or impairment of the goods; differences in features, warranties, after-sales arrangements or pricing were insufficient on the facts. Meta-tagging of a competitor's website was treated as unjustified and capable of supporting injunctive relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296716