https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296714 A society that is neither State-controlled nor State-funded is not amenable to Article 12, so a writ petition challenging its internal election dispute was not maintainable under Article 226. The court also noted that the petition was not instituted by an authorised functionary under the bye-laws, and that disputes concerning a society's affairs have a statutory remedy under Section 23 of the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001 before the competent District Court or by arbitration. On that basis, writ jurisdiction was found inappropriate and the petition was dismissed at the admission stage. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:08:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296714 A society that is neither State-controlled nor State-funded is not amenable to Article 12, so a writ petition challenging its internal election dispute was not maintainable under Article 226. The court also noted that the petition was not instituted by an authorised functionary under the bye-laws, and that disputes concerning a society's affairs have a statutory remedy under Section 23 of the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001 before the competent District Court or by arbitration. On that basis, writ jurisdiction was found inappropriate and the petition was dismissed at the admission stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296714